The most fascinating about this debate is half the people
have vague or just little understanding about it! Not that I am expertise at it,
but I would like if people understand it in the right notion; before getting in
to who is right or wrong or even trying to prove my understanding, I want all
to know as to what is intelligence? From a modern perspective to put forth my understanding
I choose Howard Garderns Multiple intelligence concept.
Gardner (1999) defines an
intelligence as ‘‘biopsychological potential to process information that can be
activated in a cultural setting to solve problems or create products that are
of value in a culture’’. According to Gardner, there are more ways to do this
than just through logical and linguistic intelligence. Gardner believes that
the purpose of schooling "should be to develop intelligences and to help
people reach vocational and avocational goals that are appropriate to their
particular spectrum of intelligences. People who are helped to do so, [he]
believe[s], feel more engaged and competent and therefore more inclined to
serve society in a constructive way."
Gardner articulated several criteria for a behavior to be an
intelligence. These were that the intelligences:
1.
Potential for brain
isolation by brain damage,
2.
Place in evolutionary
history,
3.
Presence of core
operations,
4.
Susceptibility to
encoding (symbolic expression),
5.
A distinct developmental
progression,
6.
The existence of
savants, prodigies and other exceptional people,
7.
Support from
experimental psychology and psychometric findings.
Gardner believes that eight abilities meet these criteria:
§ Spatial
§ Linguistic
§ Logical-mathematical
§ Bodily-kinesthetic
§ Musical
§ Interpersonal
§ Intrapersonal
§ Naturalistic
He considers that existential and moral intelligence may
also be worthy of inclusion.
Now I have to mention the
broad dimensions of intelligence they are the:
·
Fluid intelligence
·
Crystal Intelligence
My understanding is that intelligence has
certain amount of inheritance that cant be denied or not be given credit as
learning happens through genetic and brain does play an important role.When spoken of the counter argument that learning happens through social setting, as it involves the experience.
My question now that hasn't yet been resolved yet is where is experience coming from? Is it social or personal?
No comments:
Post a Comment